Stylistics
Sayed Adnan Eshkevari; Abdollah Hoseini; Hoda yazdan
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the components of magical realism in the Tunisian novel "Waqa'a al-Madinah al-Ghariba" and find out how "Abd al-Jabbar al-Osh," the author of this novel, relies on the genre of magical realism or presents facts through the lens of amazing and imaginary things has been able ...
Read More
This study aims to analyze the components of magical realism in the Tunisian novel "Waqa'a al-Madinah al-Ghariba" and find out how "Abd al-Jabbar al-Osh," the author of this novel, relies on the genre of magical realism or presents facts through the lens of amazing and imaginary things has been able to express political and social problems and shortcomings easily. The success of this Arabic novel in receiving the Tunisian Kumar Literary Award and the fact that this Tunisian novelist is unknown among the literary and academic community of Iran explains one of the necessities of this research; The next issue is the expression of political and social criticism in this novel, which is not limited to Tunisian society and in some way overlaps with the problems of our society today.The authors of the study, after reviewing the novel "Waqa'a al-Madinah al-Ghariba," found in a descriptive-analytical method that "Abd al-Jabbar al-Osh," relying on components such as the plot of the fantastic events, symbolization, contrast between modernity and tradition, socio-political theme and also expressionist descriptions that are among the standard components of magical realism stories have also succeeded in expressing the depth and breadth of the social and political problems of Tunisian society, In this way, by informing the reader, he encourages him to make a change in society. In this story, Al-Osh blurs the line between reality and fantasy. He uses his humorous language as a spice to depict the bitterest and darkest events of the day in a fascinating frame for his audience. After the plot of unique events, symbols in this story play a significant role. This is because discovering complex things is more appealing to the audience; Thus, in characterization and when expressing his criticisms, Al-Osh uses symbolism as his means of work.
Seyyed Ali Mirhosseini; Seyyed Adnan Eshkavari; ali Aswadi; Houman Nazemian; Abdollah Hoseini
Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to introduce Mohammad Afifi Matar as a poet and an author of several books who has a certain individual way of thinking and inciting poems which are all about using symbols and various rhetoric materials. He is one the poets who no longer use symbols in a literary matter ...
Read More
The main purpose of this study is to introduce Mohammad Afifi Matar as a poet and an author of several books who has a certain individual way of thinking and inciting poems which are all about using symbols and various rhetoric materials. He is one the poets who no longer use symbols in a literary matter but not only does he appear as a behaviorist but he also tends to introduce himself as a political critic that can find and reveal deep concerning issues and offer proper solutions to solve them. Based on his poems, it seems that Afifi Matar is always trying to purposefully create different layers of meanings by presenting philosophical thoughts with words that are capable of having different meanings. Daniel Chandler, a contemporary literary theorist, is among the many who have set their minds on finding new aspects and reaching fresh understandings based on existing words and sentences or verses a poem in which you can eventually have knowledge that cannot be achieved through the first look. Chandler believes that any symbol can be either a used one in a new form that has no refreshing meaning to offer or it’s a fresh meaning hidden inside an old symbol waiting to be found. As an example, when Afifi Matar uses the symbol of “blood” in his poems, he tries to represent that not as a simple key to sacrifice but as a worthy price that only a few can and want to pay to gain access to freedom or retrieve what once was theirs.
hossein ashoori
Abstract
Extended Abstract
1-Introduction
Identify the meaning and semantic connotation is the most important reserchers noteworthy issues. Abd -Al- quhir Al- jurjani is among reserchers who was attended to this subject. He exhibite the meaning of meaning theory pending on pitching the compilers purpose in ...
Read More
Extended Abstract
1-Introduction
Identify the meaning and semantic connotation is the most important reserchers noteworthy issues. Abd -Al- quhir Al- jurjani is among reserchers who was attended to this subject. He exhibite the meaning of meaning theory pending on pitching the compilers purpose in knowing the texts meaning. This theory is the reson for distiniction between slang and poetic language and added a second meaning to the didactic text. In resent decads structuralism and decanstructisms make the new methods replace text comprehention with reversalling this theoy. structuralism know enough text in undrstanding the meaning and decanstruct surrender undrstanding the meaning to the reader and introduce the multiplicity study or writer death.
2-Theorycal framwork
Each reserch has a reserchical structer aod theorical frame that is reserched duration it and after serching the key and formal words the resualt get earn. It can be said that ablo to gething signficance from the text ,have the specific position in didactic reserchs and language studie Arabs resercher have done extended reserchs about meaning of meaning theory and have added wew appinions to it. Western reserchers made basics changes in significance and introduction of two structuralism and decanstructisms.
3-Method
Presen reserch has aim to peruse proces of vicissitude meaninig of meaning from the first up to now and three discovering the significance methods existance in text: dominate the writer's porpuose in text (meaning of meaning) structure dominate (structuralism) and significance unpragmatism (Deconstruct). It can be said this topic is because of compartivecar study between this three new theory and hasn't been accomplished as it up to now .In continuance will be exhibit a briefe explanation about upon three methods.
a) Meaning of meaning: in this method the second and unright signficance become deliberate with standing on metaphor, Allegory and metonymy. This metpde has belived that can discover the main porpose and scompe in the text.
b) Structuralism: in this methode significance undrstanding without contemplate historical, social, political and caltural problems contemplate that is dominate on text and writers days.
c) decanstructisms: in this methode writer is a person who undrstand the significance and currect significance is that reader could undrestand it. Decanstruct dont give up any worthy for writer. decanstruct signify the unpragmatism theory with discuss the writer death theory in which each text is contain thousands significance based on writers undrestand.
4-Consequnt and discription the subject
Meaning of meaning is a lable that was invented for the first time by Abd-Al-quhir Al-jurnani ; this theory is pending on gamut pronunciation means metaphor, simile, allegory and metonymy and practice for the levele after the first significance. Roots of this theory exist on the thoughtfuls letters befor Abd-Al-qahir Al-jurjani under the title like "second significance". Current reviewers use other new terminoloy like: single significance and far functions insted of meaning of meaning.
5-Conclusion
Significance is an esoteric point in text that three upon isms thoughtful's have tried to undrestand it. Meaning of meaning has many diffrences with two structuralism and deconstructuralism as a first significance Try for discovering the meaning in text with two deconstruct and structuralism isms. This theory know the writer and his purpose undrstand significance based in text and has belive to significance twosome in one text ond possibility to discovering clear significance via undrstanding writer's purpose , but structuralism and deconstruct don't give up any prestige for meaning and meaning. Structuralism is based on text way in knowing significance and deconstruct is stand on writer realization for discovering text signiffance and know the writer death theory and unpragmatism significanc as index for undrstanding available significance in text.
Per this two isms, existance two significance spectrum and create don't have any places in knowing the meaning come from text.
